2. In Duncan v. General Motors’ sexual discriminationcase based on maintaining a “hostile work place environment”, themajority of the appeals judges believed the facts were notsignificant or egregious enough to find that the work place washostile.
(A) Do you believe that the judges should havesubstituted their own opinions on how serious Duncan’s conduct inplace of the jury’s opinion which was based on hearing the directtestimony and evidence? Explain your answer.
(B) Do you think the courts have set a clear andunderstandable standard and definition of just what constitutes a“hostile work place environment”? Specifically explain youranswer.
(C) How could the law be changed to create lessuncertainty as to what conduct is sufficient to constitute a“hostile work place environment?
Your response should be a minimum of 200 words. ( 75 pts)