Read the case study, Tarasoff v. Regents of the University of California 17 Cal. 3d 425, 131 Cal. Rptr. 14 (1976), on page 435 of your textbook. It can be found under the heading, The Courts Decides. Answer the following questions: 1. This case was brought before the court on this procedural issue: whether the trial court was correct to dismiss the complaint before a trial could be held. What do you suppose happened after the case returned to the trial court? Following this decision, courts and legislatures in other states adopted varying formulations of the “Tarasoff duty to warn.” What is the statutory or common law standard in your state? Why is the Board (the Regents) of the University of California a defendant?