This Discussion involves 4 small fact patterns that require your attention. Use your Research Posts to flush out more nuance and explore the creative space in any of the fact patterns of your liking. Discussion Question 1 1. At-Will Employment Jeremy Hoven was employed as a pharmacist by Walgreen Company (Walgreens). Hoven experienced an armed robbery at a Walgreens store during his first year of work. Hoven asked Walgreens to increase security systems, including adding a panic-button device, but Walgreens did not comply with his requests. Hoven subsequently obtained a permit to carry a concealed weapon, then purchased a handgun, which he brought to work, concealed in his pocket. During his fifth year of employment, two masked individuals with guns entered the store. One of the robbers pointed a gun at Hoven. Hoven backed away and fired his gun multiple times. No one was injured during the incident. Walgreens fired Oven, asserting that he was an at-will employee that the company could fire at any time without cause. Hoven sues Walgreens, alleging that Walgreens violated public policy because it violated the “right to bear arms” language of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Q1: Did Walgreens violate public policy when it terminated Hoven as an employee? Explain.