why vector basis is that shouldnt we use reduced echelon form Assume that A is row equivalent to B. Find bases for Nul A, Col A, and Row A. A=?1132?3396?40?30??3162?5599??,B=?1000?3000?0400?1?400?64?50?? A column vector basis for Nul A is ??????31000??,??10110?????? (Use a comma to separate vectors as needed.) is?????1132??,?40?30??,?5599?????? solutionspile.com

Question

why vector basis is that shouldnt we use reduced echelon form

$Assume that $ A $ is row equivalent to $ B $. Find bases for Nul $ A $, Col $ A $, and Row $ A $. \[ A=\left[\begin$

Assume that

A

is row equivalent to

B

. Find bases for Nul

A

, Col

A

, and Row

A

.

A = 11323396 40 ? 3 0 ? 3 162 5599, B = 100030000400 1 ? 4 00 64 ? 5 0

A column vector basis for Nul

A

is

? ? ? ? 3 1000, ? 1 0110 ? ? ?

(Use a comma to separate vectors as needed.)

is ? ? ? 1132, 40 ? 3 0, 5599 ? ? ? .

A column vector basis for

Col A

is (Use a comma to separate vectors as needed.) A row vector basis for Row

A

is (Use a comma to separate vectors as needed.)

Accepted Answer

Expert Answer to - why vector basis is that shouldnt we use reduced echelon form Assume that A is row equivalent to B.

Answer

Solution for - why vector basis is that shouldnt we use reduced echelon form Assume that A is row equivalent to B.

Answer

This an additional answer to - why vector basis is that shouldnt we use reduced echelon form Assume that A is row equivalent to B.

(Solved): why vector basis is that shouldnt we use reduced echelon form Assume that A is row equivalent to B. ...